After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Right from lie detection tools tested at the line to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to run these devices and to go after their legal right for security.

It also displays how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from accessing the stations of safety. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects so, who are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: find more although they help to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.